Blizzconline 2022 canceled! It is not known when the party will come back!

The NFL team owners are the determining persons behind the American professional football league National Football League. The National Football League is not registered organization in the true sense. Essentially, the organization consists of the assembly of the owners of the 32 teams as well as the commissioner of the NFL. These decide all substantial framework conditions (rules, agreements) of the league and also about the acquisition of franchises or shares in these. In order to maintain this construct, certain regulations have been agreed between the team owners. The basis for the rules applicable today were laid as part of the Fusion of the AFL and NFL and were available from 1 February 1970. They have been changed and adapted several times several times. Originally, the teams were mostly owned by a single person or a group of investors. With the founding of the AFL 1959, even the attempt of a stock market-traded franchise was made. The experience showed that conflicts that could influence the league operation and individual teams, especially in the absence of majority conditions. Therefore, from 1970, the specification was that the team owner must have at least 51% of the shares. In 1985, this limit was lowered to 30% and limited a limited partnership to a maximum of 15 people. But this regulation also proved to be a hindrance in particular in hereditary and estate chips. On the one hand, she prevented that appraisal regulations could be implemented at the lifetime and, on the other hand, had emerged high inheritance taxes in the case of inheritance. In 1996, it was determined that a maximum of 25 people may possess directly or indirectly shares in a franchise, at the same time it was determined that this is 30% for a family business in 2004 was agreed that with franchises the more than 10 years are owned by a family The General Partner must have 20% and have to be controlled another 10% of his family. In 2009, this requirement was again changed, even in the consideration of expected inheritances. Thus, 10% now has to be the property of the General Partner and 20% in family ownership. However, the 10-year rule continues. In autumn 2020, it was determined that teams do not have appropriate ownership and have no owners who have the ultimate decision-making power can receive a penalty of up to $ 10 million. Individuals can be punished with up to $ 2 million. For the Green Bay Packers as the only team with exclusive free float and the scheme that a shareholder may not possess more than about 4% of the franchise, a stock protection rule applies. Furthermore, owners can not be involved in several teams. Since 2018, it is possible that team owners may also possess franchises of other professional sports plants in the city of a competing NFL team. Thus, 2010 Stan Kroehnke has been commissioned to assign his shares in a basketball team and an ice hockey team to his son for the acquisition of RAMs. Non-profit organizations or companies is the possession of a franchise prohibited. A derogation is for the Houston Texans, here the Harris County holds 5% of the shares as the stadium was built with the support of the County. The qualification for the acquisition of a share in a team is checked by the other team owners. A corresponding exam is not inheriting the property rights. However, since 2014, it must be indicated which person is considered as successor to the main owner.

BlizzCon 2022 Cancelled, Reimaged - Blizzard's Crisis

Blizzard issued an official statement in which they officially refer to Blizzconline 2022. Initially, the event was postponed, and now eventually the company informs that he must reflect on the format. Therefore, the Convent from which Blizzard was famous for him and does not know when and in what form will return. However, it is ensured that important games related to games will continue.

We decided to go back a step and interrupt the planning of the previous Blizzconline event, planned for the beginning of next year. It was a difficult decision for all of us, but it is right.

Baby Blizzcon event requires the involvement of each of us, the effort of the whole company, driven by the desire to share what we create, with the community on which we care so much. At the moment we feel that the energy needed to expose such a show is best directed to supporting our teams and progress in the development of our games.

Maybe it s good? Let Blizzard not leaning out now and works in silence to provide us something valuable. On the other hand, this is probably the end of a certain era, since Blizzcon was adjusted indefinitely.

Comments